Zinn

According to Zinn, the responsibilities of historians while writing history is approached with no impairment and no bias towards a certain grimace to history. To secernate the facts(pg 8) is the main purpose of the historians when writing history and non omitting some(prenominal) facts. While writing history, a historian must ward off emphasis of some facts and ideological distortion. In this case, World warfare I and II is a good example of how a historian should do their job. While study this section in their textbook, some students develop a prejudice or generator for a side of the war, the Allies or Central power. nonetheless for some historian, they may lean to one side as well. When writing this information in the textbooks that we learn from today, the choice of wrangling and emphasis on the certain side is completely neutral. In addition, a historian should state facts on a historic event from the view block of others from different social classes, races, and nations.

As Zinn states in Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress, the treatment of heroes (Columbus) and their victims (the Arawaks)-the quiet acceptance of victory and murder in the name of progress- is precisely one verbal expression of a certain approach to history, in which the historic is told from the point of view of governments, conquerors, diplomats, leaders is an example of what a historian should not do while writing history. Writing history from views of only one side of the events causes inevitably to take sides on the side of which the story is being told; because of that, historians should writing from the about what happened from the victim and the executioners because as Zinn says the oppressor is also the victim and we should fully understand the happening is the past to avoid that mistake in the future. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .