The Birth of the Two Party System

A more ideal comparing of the alternative of 1984 would be that of 1996, inasmuch as both elections feature a well-liked incumbent president at the height of his powers opposed to a relatively second-rate resistance - in the incident of 1984, that being former Vice President Walter Mondale, who had been part of the squad defeated by Reagan in 1980 - while in 1996 the opponent was Senator Bob Dole, a man for whom the word "likeable" would not be the stolon to come to mind. The more accurate comparison with the election of 2000 would be that of 1988, when a Vice President who had served two terms under a successful president act (in that case, successfully) to extend the term of fellowship rule, as was the case in 2000; in both cases, both candidates of both parties were not in reality first-rate individuals, and the result was a one-term presidency in 1988 and plausibly the same thing in 2000 regardless of which individual lastly occupies the sporting House.

That said, it is also highly likely that the election of 2000 result occupy a very prominent place in the Statesn political history books long after the election of 1984 is remembered only by historians. The election of 2000 features the first time in 124 geezerhood that the candidate who win the national popular select looks likely to lose the electoral vote that would put him in office, and could possibly become the first election in 176 old age to end up being determined by a vote

of the U.S. House of Representatives, should the slating of electors in Florida not be finally determined, or be contested as to legitimacy, by either political party at the time they are to meet and vote in the Electoral College on the coming December 18 (Conason, 1).

The election of 1968 saw the beginnings of the collapse of the old industrial economy and the fully grown welfare state that accompanied it. The following 20 age saw the conservative attempt to downsize the wreckage.

The past eight years wee seen an attempt to lessen the negative impact of a society without strong labor unions, job security or guaranteed health insurance, an atomized nation with no safety net and no sense of collective responsibility, which the most committed conservatives idealize. Had George W. bush won decisively, it would have demonstrated that the eight years of Clinton were an anomaly, and would have amalgamate a 30-year era of conservative political and social ascendancy, the stop triumph and consolidation of the Reagan Revolution. But the popular vote mastery of Al Gore - regardless of the Electoral College outcome - suggests Americans have crossed Bill Clinton's fabled "bridge into the 21st Century." Had Bush won, Clinton would be seen as the man who truly consolidated Reaganism, with his oppose of structural welfare reform, the balanced budget and free concern (Shulman, M6).

The election of 2000 is far different. With an uncertain mandate in a Congress that allow see the Senate evenly divided for the first time since 1874, and with Republican control of the House of Representatives held by a razor-thin majority that could dissolve if the hard right leadership alienates the 20 or so moderate Republicans in office, there will be little alteration to the near-term course regardless of who enters the White House as President. However, this election is still a basin in American political history if one looks at the past thirty years of politics in America (Shulm
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.