The external surround of an organization provides its reason for existence. Therefore, the purchasing function is intimately involved with the skill of the organization to fulfill its mission, whether that mission is the servicing of welfare clients, the become of automobiles, or defending the country against armed attack. The external environment of a public sector organization, in addition, involves the general public, and the governmental funding authority for the organization. Prudent and effective use of the fiscal resources made available to the organization is congenital to the maintenance of harmonious relations in these mounts. The organizational purchasing function is intrinsical to the effective use of an organization's financial resources. As important as financial prudence and responsibility are, however, effective support of a military organization's capability to discharge its mission must be the primary goal of the purchasing function.
An organizational tenet essential to the efficient discharge of the purchasing function is centralization. In the context of public sector purchasing, centralization refers to
To be sure, the fixsource/solecustomer lift has created dependencies on both sides. The armed forces have a vested beguile in the continued financial and technological viability of their sources, and the very biography of most demurrer contractors depends on a continuing burgeon forth of contract awards (Baldo, 1988, pp. 6465). Firms such as Grumman and Northrup, as examples, would happen it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to survive in the absence of defending team contracts (Toy, 1988, pp. 2830). Further, the solesource/solecustomer polity has resulted in high fictional character and timely research and ontogenesis for national defense in the United States, as hale as in the production and placing into service highquality weapon systems (McNeill, 1992, p.
244).
the authority for the exercise of procurance responsibilities. Centralization of procurance authority is not always considered to be desirable, however, with respect to the attainment of major dedicated weapons systems. The unique roles intended for such systems often dictate against centralized a scheme of centralized procurement, in which technological compromises might be made in an flack to satisfy demands of users with significantly different missions.
The research that will be performed for the proposed study will focus on the procurement of major defense weapon systems. The findings of the proposed study, therefore, will not be straight applicable (and may not be applicable at all) to other defense and governmental procurement.
The solesource/solecustomer approach to the acquisition of major dedicated weapons systems in the United States is an outgrowth of the historical development of defense procurement in this country (Brunton, 1988, p. 601). Through the Second World War, defense production in the United States was largely publicly possess and publiclymanaged (Brunton, 1988, pp. 599600). Even during the Second World War, when it was essential to amaze civilian manufacturers into def
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment