What is the Cause of Vietnam War?

Both U.S. and foreign critics retain argued that the South Vietnamese government was never a genuine, viable, or democratic government. Instead, they claim, it was a puppet government set up by the U.S. and the French in order to give the united renders an acceptable reason for its invasion of an Asian country.

It would be sternly to be sure outright, with so much water having asleep(p) under the bridge, which position was true; and probably the truth limit somewhere in between, as it often does. However, the critics' position tends to come apart on the question of what actor the USA would seduce had for wanting(p) to be in Vietnam at all. The only plausible motive was that it was part of a global U.S. Cold War insurance policy of attempting to contain the commie world, as Robert McNamara asserts that it was. However, if the U.S. merely wanted a bulwark against communism in Southeast Asia, there would have been much easier and safer ways to set one up.

After slightly six decades of fighting, in the 1970s Vietnam ended up unified, independent, and with Ho Chi Minh as its President. Would it not have been simpler and more benevolent to have allowed that to happen after World War Two, or during the Eisenhower administration? Of course, hindsight being clearer than foresight, that knowms open now, but, as McNamara says, it was not obvious then or in the 196

McNamara relates that the U.S. commitment to South Vietnam grew gradually, with the reasons given for the growth slowly changed also. In 1961 Kennedy committed the U.S. to send 16,000 military advisors to Vietnam to train the South Vietnamese to defend themselves against aggression from the north. In October 1963, he announced that the U.S. evaluate the training to be complete by 1965, and that the U.S. would approach withdrawing serviceman by the end of 1963. And then, of course, the roof caved in.

McNamara relates that in 1961 he, like approximately Americans, saw fabianism as being monolithic, the Russians and Chinese as being tight allies, whereas by hindsight he can see that they had no unified strategy for world conquest or anything else after the late 1950s.

The Kennedy administration believed that the Communist movement in Vietnam was closely related to guerrilla insurgencies in Burma, Indonesia, Malaya, and the Philippines in the 1950s. Whereas now they appear to have been nationalistic and relatively independent movements, then the government thought they were all part of a Communist master plan for world domination. Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy had all believed that the loss of Indochina to Communism would threaten U.S. security. Hence, the U.S. had set up the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization, conditionally pledging the U.S. to defend Indochina, and had pumped seven billion dollars in sparing and military aid into South Vietnam by 1961.

0s. It has been asked why Ho and Vietnam were not considered to be similar to Tito and Yugoslavia. McNamara says that they did not seem similar, that the US administration equated Ho instead with Fidel Castro. He comments on the chaff of the fact that the reason the U.S. lacked competent experts on Indochina in the State Department was because the top experts had been purged during the McCarthy era

Terkel, Studs. "The Good War": An literal History of World War Two. New York: Pantheon Books, 1984.

At the begin
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.